Propositions that fall in the continuum between controversial and utterly insane. Often we’re tongue-in-cheek. Often, dead severe.
- Facebook Twitter
- 494 shares article that is email website website link
Copy backlink to share with friends
Why you need to care
Because university is approximately more than Bush c’s that are getting smoking some weed.
The Constant Dose AUG 20 2015
I’ll show you mine me yours if you show.
This appears to be the unspoken guideline surrounding presidential prospects’ histories. Tax statements? Sure, I’ll release them — just be sure Mitt does too. Wellness documents? okay, but so-and-so is pretty old too — how’s his ticker? Rules for disclosure in presidential elections are interestingly nil. We could see whom funds whom (type of), and now we is able to see voting records. But the rest? We’re restricted to the mistress whom turns up on CNN in the middle of the campaign or perhaps the essay writing hubbub which will emerge around income tax re re payments or the shortage thereof. Or, within the latest situation, the stress looming over Hillary Clinton and her email messages, aka Benghazi 2.0.
The problem, we figure, is the fact that while all that information is advantageous, it does not much inform us who’s getting our votes. Because if the alleged alcohol test — which candidate could you instead grab a alcohol with? — is real, then character issues. So herein, a concept, admittedly one from some body who’d prefer that is much grab a alcohol with somebody who has some key nerd inside them: Upon announcing their candidacy, applicants should universally sign away privacy liberties for their undergrad documents, essays and also theses. Okumaya devam et “Forget Email Messages: We Should See Hillary’s University Papers”